Diplo Internet Governance Community

Stay networked. Get informed. Broadcast your projects.

e-Democracy for Meaningful Development and Strengthening Governance

Democracy means different things to different people as a result of their values, philosophy, culture, environment, status, inclination, enlightenment and experience.

Democracy entails the process of considering various options and views before arriving at a decision based on mutual consensus. It is consultative and multi dimensional in nature. The quality of the process, input and results are based on the knowledge and preference of the community or stakeholders. It is relevant in global, national or local community governance, as well as in academics, business, civil society, demographic, economic, family, religion, social etc.

The word "democracy" has its origins in the Greek language. It combines two shorter words: "demos" meaning whole citizen living within a particular city-state and "kratos" meaning power or rule. However, both terms have more than one meaning (Arblaster, 1996) http://www.abc.net.au/civics/democracy/td_primary.htm 

e-Democracy promotes communication, consultation, collaboration, deliberation, education and performance evaluation to strengthen the democratic process.  It is applicable to different contexts. It can be any situation that has a democratic element or the need for stakeholder engagement and consultations.

Social media has contributed to the transformation of institutional and national governance. However, the entrenchment true participative, sustainable, context based and development directed democracy is a long, steady and demanding process. The Arab spring is a classic example. Events are still unfolding, long after the change of the principal actors in government.

It is a common fallacy to measure the democratic governance process by the standard of some western countries, thus isolating the contextual and developmental need of the people concerned.

Recurring question is to ascertain if democracy is the right/best form of governance? The answer is democracy is a concept in development with its positive and negative components based on its application, process, people, space and knowledge of the stakeholders. Democracy is not necessarily the best form of governance system but, it is probably the most sustainable, enduring and "best" so far available.

Through effective democratic process, the citizens have a better opportunity of expressing their view, getting their perspectives heard, creating exerting some influence on their representative and being better informed, thus making a broader segment of the community to feel as part of the decision making process, ownership of the emanating policies and increase in support of the implementation.

Democratic and e-democracy expression may be through direct participation, elected representatives or a combination of various options based on the constitution, culture, economy, wealth/poverty index, allegiance – party, ethnic or religious  and the reality on ground. Some scholars have attempted to associate democracy with slavery and sexism in ancient Greek, since the Greek used a model of direct representation which allowed only male that could defend the nation in war to vote, excluding female and slaves. 

The need for meaningful collaboration, need-based capacity building to positively influence the segment of influence in the community, properly defined process and governance value evaluation in order to harness the benefits of the process for sustainable development and improved governance through e-democracy cannot be overemphasized.

The literacy level, success of e-democracy and national development are heavily dependent on the effectiveness of the factors listed below:

 

Capacity building

Literacy level

Political will

Good leadership

Clear national vision

Trust

Honesty

Transparent governance

Consultation

Collaboration

Consensus

Appropriate legislation

Adaptation

Technology

Views: 113

Tags: Building, Capacity, Democracy, Development, Governance, Government, Sustainable, e-democracy

Comment

You need to be a member of Diplo Internet Governance Community to add comments!

Join Diplo Internet Governance Community

Comment by John Bosco Kintu KAVUMA on July 23, 2012 at 11:55am
Dear Rising,
Thanks for sharing great insights on the pros and cons of democracy, as well as the potential benefits and critical factors for success of e-democracy. I would however have loved to see some practical ways in which ICTs can be deployed to foster democratic processes and the likely challenges. nonetheless, I will share my insights on how ICTs has been deployed in Uganda to promote democratic processes (e-democracy) and the challenges.

The ways in which ICTs have been used to influence democratic processes in uganda include the following:
• Electoral Commission - implemented electronic voter's registry (voter update exercise) where people could get the status of their registration by use of mobile phone and internet.
Civil society have developed blogs and social networks where they exchange and share experiences on issues relating to governance
• Civil society use mobile based applications such as SMS to mobilize their members for different social causes
• Human rights Activists such as the defunct A4C and 4GC are reported to be using lots of SMS and Social networks to pass message onto their constituents
• Other interest groups such as the Journalists and sex minorities
In nutshell, ICTs have been utilised to promote the following democratic processes;
• Mobilizing citizenry for civil activities such as elections
• Soliciting citizens contribution to topical issues in the country. These are normally posted as individual opinions on blogs and social networks while prompting others to comment.
• Online platforms and forums with face2face interludes such as mobile Monday
• Topical issues on electronic media
• Participation in policy process

There are however limitations/constraints to use ICTs in democratic processes in Uganda and Africa at large. They include:
• Access and penetration of ICTs is still limited
• The content is limited with little or no local content
• The cost for internet bandwidth is still high
• Lack of complementary infrastructure such as power may access a challenge
• Illiteracy levels and poor attitude

For actual realisation of the e-democracy, I would like to see Ugandans voting by proxy (this will however require change in the electoral laws first); Ugandans communities becoming more civically aware not simply the electoral process awareness that comes few months to elections; and real citezen empowerment in terms of unlimited access to affordable ICTs such as mobile phones, TVs and Internet.

My recommendation for expeditious and meaningful promotion of e-democracy in Africa are:
• There is a need to promote local content development through protection of content and incentives
• Need to extend lastmile connectivity to priority users such as schools, health centres and district headquarters to ensure access to high speed internet connectivity
• Improve awareness creation and mindset change campaigns

Members

Follow us

Website and downloads

Visit Diplo's IG website, www.diplomacy.edu/ig for info on programmes, events, and resources.

The full text of the book An Introduction to Internet Governance is available here. The translated versions in Serbian/BCS (4th ed.), as well as first editions in French, Spanish, Arabic, Russian, Chinese, and Portuguese are also available for download.

Interviews


Karlene Francis (Jamaica)
Ivar Hartmann
(Brazil)
Elona Taka (Albania)
Fahd Batayneh (Jordan)
Edward Muthiga (Kenya)
Nnenna Nwakanma (Côte d'Ivoire)
Xu Jing (China)
Gao Mosweu (Botswana)
Jamil Goheer (Pakistan)
Virginia (Ginger) Paque (Venezuela)
Tim Davies (UK)
Charity Gamboa-Embley (Philippines)
Rafik Dammak (Tunisia)
Jean-Yves Gatete (Burundi)
Guilherme Almeida (Brazil)
Magaly Pazello (Brazil)
Sergio Alves Júnior (Brazil)
Adela Danciu (Romania)
Simona Popa (Romania)
Marina Sokolova (Belarus)
Andreana Stankova (Bulgaria)
Vedran Djordjevic (Canada)
Maria Morozova (Ukraine)
David Kavanagh (Ireland)
Nino Gobronidze (Georgia)
Sorina Teleanu (Romania)
Cosmin Neagu (Romania)
Maja Rakovic (Serbia)
Elma Demir (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
Tatiana Chirev (Moldova)
Maja Lubarda (Slovenia)
Babatope Soremi (Nigeria)
Marilia Maciel (Brazil)
Raquel Gatto (Brazil)
Andrés Piazza (Argentina)
Nevena Ruzic (Serbia)
Deirdre Williams (St. Lucia)
Maureen Hilyard (Cook Islands)
Monica Abalo (Argentina)
Emmanuel Edet (Nigeria)
Mwende Njiraini (Kenya)
Marsha Guthrie (Jamaica)
Kassim M. AL-Hassani (Iraq)
Marília Maciel (Brazil)
Alfonso Avila (Mexico)
Pascal Bekono (Cameroon)

© 2013   Created by Community Owner.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service