Diplo Internet Governance Community
Stay networked. Get informed. Broadcast your projects.
This is a copy of a blog post also available at http://isoc.org/wp/igf2010/ ISOC's 2010 IGF Blog
Why is private data of businesses or bodies corporate held as property yet the private communications of an individual do not get this treatment? By the end of the future of privacy workshop, this was one of the questions
that occurred to me.
Enlightening? Certainly. There were generally two views, that either we need the laws to adopt to changing times or that we need need new laws to adopt to these times as far as privacy is concerned. Whatever the case, I heard of rights some of which have never before occurred to me before as rights. These are the rights that are likely to comprise the future of privacy....Here are some:
the right not to be stalked
the right of in large excess
the right not to be bound by a decision taken by a machine
the right to have data erased
the right to oblivion or
the right to be forgotten
the right to be left alone.
How will these rights be achieved and implemented?
Some panelists said there is need to review existing laws, such as the European Convention to incorporate these emerging needs. Others thought that there was need to implement privacy by design technologies.
Overall, there was an emphasis on incorporating social aspects in privacy, for example by ensuring transparency and usability in user interfaces. I thought that as a Kenyan, seeing as we do not yet have
adequate privacy and data protection laws, we still have the benefit of experience – we can learn from those who have tried and tested these laws. But fundamentally, we have to let people know that privacy is a
right that exists to protect their wellbeing!
While I enjoyed and was enlightened by this forum, I still felt that for the privacy discussion to find a place in my community in Kenya, it would have to be in the context of mobile communications. Mostly because this
is a big area as far as personal communications are concerned and also because most of the complaints I have had to do with privacy were related to unwanted text messages . But I realise that the world is growing faster than I, and I should not be surprised to meet people looking to enact the “right not to bound by a decision taken by a machine”
98 members
19 members
20 members
84 members
55 members
Visit Diplo's IG website, www.diplomacy.edu/ig for info on programmes, events, and resources.
The full text of the book An Introduction to Internet Governance is available here. The translated versions in Serbian/BCS (4th ed.), as well as first editions in French, Spanish, Arabic, Russian, Chinese, and Portuguese are also available for download.

Karlene Francis (Jamaica)
Ivar Hartmann (Brazil)
Elona Taka (Albania)
Fahd Batayneh (Jordan)
Edward Muthiga (Kenya)
Nnenna Nwakanma (Côte d'Ivoire)
Xu Jing (China)
Gao Mosweu (Botswana)
Jamil Goheer (Pakistan)
Virginia (Ginger) Paque (Venezuela)
Tim Davies (UK)
Charity Gamboa-Embley (Philippines)
Rafik Dammak (Tunisia)
Jean-Yves Gatete (Burundi)
Guilherme Almeida (Brazil)
Magaly Pazello (Brazil)
Sergio Alves Júnior (Brazil)
Adela Danciu (Romania)
Simona Popa (Romania)
Marina Sokolova (Belarus)
Andreana Stankova (Bulgaria)
Vedran Djordjevic (Canada)
Maria Morozova (Ukraine)
David Kavanagh (Ireland)
Nino Gobronidze (Georgia)
Sorina Teleanu (Romania)
Cosmin Neagu (Romania)
Maja Rakovic (Serbia)
Elma Demir (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
Tatiana Chirev (Moldova)
Maja Lubarda (Slovenia)
Babatope Soremi (Nigeria)
Marilia Maciel (Brazil)
Raquel Gatto (Brazil)
Andrés Piazza (Argentina)
Nevena Ruzic (Serbia)
Deirdre Williams (St. Lucia)
Maureen Hilyard (Cook Islands)
Monica Abalo (Argentina)
Emmanuel Edet (Nigeria)
Mwende Njiraini (Kenya)
Marsha Guthrie (Jamaica)
Kassim M. AL-Hassani (Iraq)
Marília Maciel (Brazil)
Alfonso Avila (Mexico)
Pascal Bekono (Cameroon)
© 2013 Created by Community Owner.
You need to be a member of Diplo Internet Governance Community to add comments!
Join Diplo Internet Governance Community